III) While in the Variation of your father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second Model) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed towards the petitioner and others was simple existence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a effectively-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
Life imprisonment is surely an alternative on the death penalty. In such cases, the convicted person is sentenced to spend the remainder of their natural life behind bars.
maintaining the conviction awarded for the appellant reduce the sentence from the appellant from imprisonment for life to at least one already undergone(Pakistan Penal Code)
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Touching on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 with the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is usually a mandatory requirement as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation necessitates that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. Should the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.
The issue here is that an accused might say that they intended to injure the sufferer, but they did not intend to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted as a result of accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
department concerned shall deliver the complete list of ACRs from the concerned officer to DPC very well in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)
two. I have read the realized counsel for that parties as well as learned DPG at length, perused the record and observed that:-
Hence, it absolutely was held that the right to the healthy environment was part in the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article nine and 14 with the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all such amenities and services that a person is entitled to appreciate with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its prospective to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity from the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is important for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right into a healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions inside the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it can be important that the case recognized the application of the precautionary principle where there is often a menace to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations of the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.
Pakistan’s legal system just isn't without flaws: overhauling is overdue as well as the regulation regarding murder requires really serious reconsideration and clarification. With the time being, the the very least that can be carried out is to verify that click here the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.